RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, VOL. 20, ES1005, doi:10.2205/2020ES000693, 2020

Table 1. Variability of Potential Density at Different Depths According to the Aqualog Data for the Cold Season of 2015–2016
Depth, m Mean Standard Minimal Maximal Delta
potential deviation potential potential
density density density
80 14.19 0.32 13.13 14.94 1.81
85 14.28 0.34 13.17 15.05 1.89
90 14.36 0.38 13.23 15.18 1.95
95 14.46 0.41 13.34 15.29 1.94
100 14.57 0.43 13.66 15.40 1.73
105 14.69 0.45 13.71 15.55 1.83
110 14.82 0.46 13.78 15.73 1.95
115 14.96 0.45 13.78 15.85 2.06
120 15.11 0.44 13.89 15.96 2.06
125 15.25 0.43 13.94 16.02 2.08
130 15.39 0.40 13.98 16.09 2.10
135 15.51 0.38 14.04 16.16 2.12
140 15.62 0.35 14.19 16.20 2.01
145 15.73 0.32 14.44 16.28 1.84
150 15.83 0.29 14.47 16.30 1.83
155 15.91 0.27 14.52 16.34 1.82
160 15.99 0.24 14.87 16.38 1.51
165 16.06 0.22 15.19 16.42 1.23
170 16.12 0.19 15.28 16.44 1.16
175 16.18 0.17 15.48 16.46 0.98
180 16.23 0.15 15.49 16.51 1.02
185 16.28 0.14 15.50 16.54 1.04
190 16.32 0.12 15.85 16.57 0.71
195 16.36 0.11 15.98 16.58 0.60
200 16.39 0.10 16.01 16.60 0.59
205 16.42 0.09 16.03 16.63 0.59
210 16.45 0.09 16.05 16.65 0.59
215 16.48 0.08 16.05 16.67 0.62
219 16.50 0.08 16.11 16.68 0.57

      Powered by MathJax

 
Citation: Zatsepin A. G., V. V. Kremenetskiy, O. I. Podymov, A. G. Ostrovskii (2020), Study of the effects of Ekman dynamics in the bottom boundary layer on the Black Sea continental slope, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 20, ES1005, doi:10.2205/2020ES000693.
 

Generated from LaTeX source by ELXfinal, v.2.0 software package.