Discussion

[3]  We consider the influence of the vegetation cover within a model of homogeneous isotropic "forest layer" with effective values of the electrical conductivity and dielectric permeability. In the case when the wavelength l of the electromagnetic wave is much longer than the tree height hlgg h ), the influence of the latter on electromagnetic wave propagation may be neglected [Reinolds, 1953] in the model of vertical electrical antenna with a capacitive load. In this model the soil and tree branches form plates of a condenser, whereas the tree trunk is equivalent to a resistance put between the plates. In this case, at the impact on the tree of the vertical component of the monochromatic field En1 (the dependence on time is accepted in the form e-iwt ), in the equivalent circuit of the tree with the effective height hg, trunk resistance Rg, and capacity Cg under the condition khgll 1 a current I (distributed almost homogeneously) appears:

eq001.gif(1)

where Zg is the effective complex resistance of the tree, k= w /c, w is the circular frequency, and c is the speed of light in the vacuum.

[4]  As a result of theoretical and experimental studies, Egorov [1990] showed that the predicted values of Rg and Cg may be calculated with the accuracy of 10% using the formulae

eq002.gif(2)

where sg(t o C) is the specific electrical conductivity of the wood of the tree trunk depending on the temperature of the surrounding medium, S tr is the average area of the tree trunk, S top is the area of the lower part of its top, and h top is the height of the lower part of the top from the surface.

[5]  If one neglects the finite conductivity of the soil and takes the tree into account in the model of the vertical electrical antenna with the capacity load, then, taking into account (1), the reemitted by the tree vertical component of the electrical field on the ideally conducting plane is determined as

eq003.gif(3)

where R= (r2g + hg2)1/2, and rg is the distance from the tree to the observation point.

[6]  We consider the case when trees are distributed with some density n on the ideally conducting plane. Then the total field at the observation point consists of the initial field En1 that would have existed in the absence of the trees and the total field of the trees reemitting:

eq004.gif

eq005.gif(4)

Feinberg [1999] showed that the field on the plane-underlying surface with finite values of electrical properties of the lower semispace may be presented in the form

eq006.gif(5)

where En1 is the field over the ideally conducting Earth surface, and d is the reduced surface impedance of the underlying surface.

[7]  In the case of neglecting by the influence of static ( R-3 ) and induction ( R-2 ) terms of the field reemitted by the trees (that is, taking into account only the wave ( R-1 ) terms of this field) we obtain, comparing (5) and (4)

eq007.gif(6)

We estimate the ratio of the total field reemitted by all trees and due only to the wave terms of the field to the quasi-static field reemitted by one tree located in the close vicinity of the observation point (rg2ll hg2 ).

[8]  The normal component of the electrical field in the case when the emitter and the observation point are located on an impedance plane has the form [Feinberg, 1999]

eq008.gif(7)

where Ia and ha are the current in the base of the emitting antenna and its virtual height, respectively, r is the distance from the emission source to the measurement point, W(sr) is the attenuation function, s= ikd2/2, and d is the surface impedance (6).

[9]  Equalizing the right-hand sides of formulae (7) and (5), we obtain the following expression for the total field reemitted by the trees due only to the wave terms of the reemitted field ( R-1 ):

eq009.gif(8)

The normal component of the electrical field reemitted by one tree in the direct vicinity of it may be found in the quasi-static approximation ( R-3 ) from formula (3) under condition rg2ll hg2, i.e., kR = khg ll 1

eq010.gif(9)

Taking into account the designation

eq011.gif

we obtain from formulae (8) and (9) the sought for ratio of the total field reemitted by all trees due only to the wave terms of the field to the quasi-static field reemitted by one tree

eq012.gif

Here

eq013.gif

eq014.gif

To estimate |DEn| we use the results of experiments [Egorov, 1990]. It follows from the latter that at a frequency of 250 kHz the value |e'f/(ef'-1)| = 2.3 at rg le hg/4. Therefore, even in the most unfavorable case |sr|gg 1, the secondary field reemitted by a tree located at a distance equal to or smaller than hg/4 (i.e., in the direct vicinity of the observation point) is comparable by the modulus to the total secondary field reemitted by all trees due to only the wave terms.

[10]  In the quasi-static vicinity of the observation point within a large forest, there are (depending on the wavelength) hundreds (MW), thousands (LW), and even tens of thousands (ELW) of trees. So it is evident that to estimate the secondary field reemitted by the trees, one has in the first turn to take into account the influence of the trees located in the quasi-static zone.

[11]  According to the aforesaid we formulate the problem on determination of the vegetation cover on propagation of electromagnetic waves in the following way: on the ideally conducting plane similar trees with the virtual height hg and effective complex resistance Zg are distributed homogeneously. One needs to determine in the quasi-static approximation the total field reemitted by the trees. In this case, using formula (3), the total quasi-static field reemitted by the trees may be written in the form

eq015.gif(10)

where En1(Rj) is the normal component of the falling electrical field from all the trees in the point of location of the j th tree, Rj is the distance from the emitter to the j th tree, and rgj is the distance from the j th tree to the observation point.

[12]  It follows from (3) that for all k rgj ge 1, i.e., for all the trees outside the radius rgj ge (l/2 p), the input of the quasi-static terms of reemission by the modulus is less than or equal to the input of the wave terms of the reemission. In the previous considerations we have already neglected the input of the wave terms of the field reemitted by the trees. Therefore we may also neglect the influence of the quasi-static terms of the reemitted field due to the trees located outside the l/2 p radius. Taking into account the aforesaid, formula (10) may be transformed into the form of a finite sum

eq016.gif(11)

where m is the number of trees located inside the circle with a radius of l/2 p. Formula (11) takes into account that the falling field En1 within the l/2 p circle stays almost constant.

[13]  The total field reemitted by the trees (11) in principle may depend on the location of the observation point within the large forest. We estimate the total reemitted field in two extreme cases, that is, when the observation point is located or directly near a particular tree, or in the middle between four trees.

[14]  Estimating the reemitted field in the direct vicinity of a tree, one should take into account the influence of this tree determined by formula (11) in the case of fulfilling the condition rg/hg to 0 ( m= 1). In this case, 8 the nearest trees are located at sides and angles of a rectangle with the side length of 2dd is the distance between trees), that is, on the average located at a distance equal to the semisum of radiuses of the circles inscribed into the rectangle and described around it. The following 16 trees are located at sides and in angles of a rectangle with the side length of 4d, etc.

eq017.gif(12)

eq018.gif

eq019.gif

In the m agg 1 case,

eq020.gif

eq021.gif

That is, series (12) is converging rapidly as a series for the Riemann x function x(2). Taking into account that

eq022.gif

we obtain

eq023.gif(13)

where

eq024.gif

and

eq025.gif

Q1 characterizing the estimate of an error of the series (13) calculation.

[15]  On the analogy to the previous example, the total field of reemission in the point equidistant from the nearest four trees has the form

eq026.gif(14)

eq027.gif

eq028.gif

where Q2 characterizes the estimate of calculation of series (14).

[16]  Table 1 shows the results of calculation of the values of A1 + Q1 and A2 + Q2 as a function of the a parameter characterizing the thickness of large forests: a = 1, a = 0.5, and a = 0.25 correspond to thin, moderate, and thick forests. It follows from the table that the total reemitted field under the given thickness of the forest almost does not depend on the location of the observation point between the trees, that is, it is a constant value in the quasi-static vicinity rg le l /2 p relative to the observation point. Taking this into account, it follows from (11) that the ratio of the normal component of the falling electrical field En1 to the normal component of the total electrical field within the large forest En1+ sum En2 is a constant value which according to the boundary conditions for the normal components of the electric field at the boundary between similar media characterizes the relative complex dielectric permeability of the large forest e'f in the model of a homogeneous isotropic "forest layer"

eq029.gif(15)

It follows from Table 1 that to calculate the total reemitted field within the large forest, one can use the approximate formula correct for any thickness of the forest within the interval:

eq030.gif

The formula makes it possible to calculate the total reemitted field with an error less than 5% by the modulus. Taking into account formula (2) we have

eq031.gif(16)

[17]  In a large forest, the height of the top of all trees h top is much larger than that of a single staying tree and tends to the value of hg , i.e., h top le hg. At the same time, the treetop in the forest almost covers the entire area d2 covered by this tree, i.e., d2 ge S top. So one can take that the parameter d2 h top/S top hg =1. Substituting expression (16) into formula (15), we finally obtain

eq032.gif(17)

Similar consideration may be performed concerning the total reemitted field of the tangential components of the magnetic field of the trees. Because of the circular symmetry of the problem, the tangential components of the magnetic field of the trees are mutually compensated and the total reemitted magnetic field within the large forest is absent.

[18]  Thus in the case lgg h, the influence of large forests on propagation of electromagnetic waves (independently of the height of the forest and its thickness) may be taken into account in the model of homogeneous isotropic "forest layer" with the effective dielectric and magnetic permeability equal to the dielectric and magnetic permeability in vacuum, respectively. The effective electric conductivity is determined by the formula

eq033.gif(18)

The dimensionless parameter S tr/d2 characterizing the ratio of the area covered by the tree trunks to the entire area of the large forest may be determined using topographic maps of the scale 1:100,000 and larger, where the mean diameters of tree trunks and distances between them are indicated.

2005GI000117-fig01
Figure 1
[19]  Figure 1 shows the values of the specific electric conductivity of trunks of deciduous (solid curve 1) and coniferous (solid curve 2) species of trees under direct current as a function of the temperature (for central Europe) according to Kashprovsky and Kuzubov [1971]. The values of sg (t o C) for deciduous and coniferous trees coincide with each other in the temperature interval from +20 oC to -5 o C and vary from 1.1 times 10-2 to 10-3 S m-1. For other temperatures the curves diverge strongly. Figure 1 shows also the values of sg (t o C) for the coniferous species of trees for the southern part of western Siberia (dashed curve) [Zakharenko, 1991].

[20]  One can see from Figure 1 that the specific electric conductivity of trunks sg (t o C) of deciduous species of trees in central Europe almost repeats the specific electric conductivity of trunks of coniferous species of trees in the southern part of western Siberia within the entire range of the environmental temperatures from - 20 oC to +20 oC with the a standard deviation by a factor of 2.7.

[21]  In principle, one can use the above presented values of sg (t o C) at direct current in the hypothesis of the absence of frequency dispersion. However, still stay unclear both the representativeness of the sg (t o C) values at particular trees for different large forests covering 40% of the Earth's land and the reliability of the hypothesis of frequency dispersion absence.

[22]  To solve the above indicated problems, we developed a method of measurements of effective electric properties of a "forest layer" directly at the frequencies of the emitted electromagnetic field.

[23]  It is known that at falling of a plain vertically polarized wave within a "forest layer" having the effective complex dielectric permeability e'f and located on the Earth's surface with the relative complex dielectric permeability e'g, the following relation is true:

eq034.gif(19)

where Hta is the tangential component of the falling magnetic field at the air-forest boundary in the air, En a is the normal component of the falling electric field at the air-forest boundary in the air, Htf is the tangential component of the magnetic field within the "forest layer" at any height h le z le 0, and En f is the normal component of the falling electric field within the "forest layer" at any height h le z le 0. Formula (19) is correct for any falling angles of a plain vertically polarized wave.

[24]  The electromagnetic field from the vertical electrical antenna may be presented as a superposition of plain waves, so one can state that formula (19) is correct for the fields of radio stations at such distances from the source that one can neglect induction-statistical terms of emission and direct penetration of electromagnetic waves through the "forest layer" and underlying Earth's surface, that is, by all mechanisms of underground propagation in the soil and within the large forest.

[25]  As a result, we obtain that to determine e'f, it is enough to measure the admittances of the electromagnetic field from radio stations within the "forest layer" and in the air over the forest. Because of technical difficulties of measuring admittance over the forest, in the first approximation one can determine e'f using measurements of the admittance at some distance from the forest in the field and in the forest along the front of the electromagnetic wave from the radio station at distances rle l, where l is the wavelength of the emitted wave.

[26]  We determined admittance using a two-channel selective microvoltmeter, which makes it possible to measure the ratio of amplitudes and phase shift of two signals in the MW range channels. A rotating magnetic antenna was connected to one of the channel for tuning to the maximum of the magnetic field. A vertical electric antenna was connected to the other channel. The measurements were conducted in three stages. First, the measuring device was installed in a field at a distance larger than 10 hg from the forest edge and the measurements of the value of ga =(hm/hel)(Hta/Ena) were carried out. Then the measuring device was installed in the forest at a distance larger than 10 hg from the forest edge and the value of gf =(hm/he1)(Htf/Enf) was measured. After than the device was returned to the field at the same point in order to be sure that the amplitude-phase characteristics of the device channels did not change during the experiment. The ratio of gf to ga makes it possible to exclude unknown values of the virtual heights of the electric hel and magnetic hm antennae, i.e., to determine the soaked for value of the effective complex dielectric permeability of the "forest layer"  e'f.

2005GI000117-fig02
Figure 2
[27]  On the basis of numerous measurements of admittances at frequencies of 250 kHz and 550 kHz in the summer, fall, and winter conditions in the neighborhood of St. Petersburg in coniferous (pine) and deciduous (birch) forests, we found that the effective dielectric permeability of the "forest layer" ef = 1.20 pm 0.05 independently of the tree species and the temperature of the environment within the entire range from - 20 oC to +20 oC. The effective electric conductivity of the "forest layer" sf (t o C) also does not depend on the tree species and varies from 2.5 times 10-5 S m-1 (+20 oC) to 1.8 times 10-7 S m-1 (-20 oC). The character of the sf (t oC) behavior as a function of the air temperature is shown in Figure 2 [Egorov, 2003].

[28]  Thus we succeeded in obtaining the effective values of the complex dielectric permeability of the "forest layer" as a function of the environmental temperature directly at the electromagnetic field frequencies without any knowledge on the specific electric conductivity of tree trunks sg (t o C) and on the values of the dimensionless parameter S tr/d2. It should be noted that the values of the effective dielectric permeability of the "forest layer" are obtained for rather local areas of large forests with the length of a few tens of meters from the forest edge.

[29]  In order to estimate the representativeness of the obtained data for vast large forests in the Leningrad Region, we conducted measurements of the modulus |W| and additional phase j add of the attenuation function at a frequency of 350 kHz along a forest path 100 km long. The results of the measurements are shown in the bottom line of Table 2 [Egorov, 2000].

[30]  The propagation path may be characterized as a two-layer structure. The large forest with a height of 15 m and effective electric properties (ef = 1.2, sf = 2.5 times 10-5 S m-1 in summer ( +15 oC) and ef = 1.2, sf = 2.5 times 10-6 S m-1 in winter ( -5 o C), Figure 2) is located on the Earth's surface which within the skin effect is presented by well-studied soils and quaternary sediments and is characterized by the values eg = 20, sg = 2.5 times 10-2 S m -1. The top line of Table 2 shows the calculated values of the modulus and phase of the surface impedance of the two-layer structure and predicted values of the attenuation function.

[31]  It follows from Table 2 that the predicted and experimentally measured values of |W| differ by 10% and values of j add differ by 0.1 rad, both values being within the accuracy limits of the model and experiment.

2005GI000117-fig03
Figure 3
[32]  Points in Figure 3 show the experimental values of the attenuation function |W| as a function of the environmental temperature for the frequency of 272 kHz along the path about 200 km long [Korzhinskaya et al., 1991].

[33]  The propagation path may be presented in the form of a two-layer structure: the large forest with a height of 15 m with the effective electric properties determined by Figure 2 is located on the Earth's surface which within the skin effect layer is characterized by the values eg = 20, sg = 1.4 times 10-2  S m -1. The predicted values of the modulus of the attenuation function |W| for the above indicated two-layer structure are shown in Figure 3 by the solid curve.

[34]  A good agreement of the experiment and theory within the entire range of environmental temperature variations from -20 o C to +20 o C makes it possible to state that local measurements of the effective electric properties of the "forest layer" conducted in the neighborhood of St. Petersburg are representative for large forest with different area and composition located within the Freznel zones (important for electromagnetic wave propagation) both in the northwest part of the European part of Russia and in the southern part of western Siberia.

[35]  In conclusion, we consider one more feature of electromagnetic wave propagation along forest paths. At electromagnetic wave propagation along forest paths we, evidently, have the case, when the modulus of the effective complex dielectric permeability of the "forest layer" is much less than the modulus of the dielectric permeability of the Earth's underlying surface (|e'f| ll |e'g| ). Therefore large forests may be physically presented as a thin badly conducting layer located on the well-conducting base. This leads to a decrease of the argument of the impedance of the two-layer path as compared to the impedance of the base, i.e., to a shift into strongly inductive region (arg dl < -p /4). Makarov et al. [1991] showed that, as a result, the modulus of the attenuation function at some distances from the emitter becomes higher than unity. That means that because of the influence of the Zennek surface wave, the field over forest paths at some distances will be higher by the modulus than the field over an infinite conducting plane.

2005GI000117-fig04
Figure 4
[36]  Figure 4 shows results of the calculations of dl for various heights of forest as a function of the frequency for summer conditions. It follows from Figure 4 that for all frequencies f < 600 kHz, arg  dl < -p /4 (a strongly inductive surface), whereas in the frequency range 600-1000 kHz, arg  dl > -p /4 (a weakly inductive surface).

2005GI000117-fig05
Figure 5
[37]  Figure 5 shows the results of calculations of the attenuation function modulus |W| for the large forests with a height of 12.5 m (solid curves) and of experimental measurements of |W| (circles) at the same path in summer at the air temperature of +15 o C [Egorov, 2002]. It follows from Figure 5 that (in a complete agreement with the developed theory) at the frequency f = 236 kHz, because of the influence of the Zennek surface wave, the attenuation function modulus |W| >1 at distances up to 100 km from the emitter, whereas at f = 800 kHz, because of the shift of the argument of the surface impedance arg  dl into weakly inductive region, the effect disappears.


AGU

Powered by TeXWeb (Win32, v.2.0).