5. Determination of the Meridional and Zonal Wind From the Longitudinal Variations in W

[10]  The velocity of the plasma vertical drift caused by the neutral wind is described by the known relation:

eq006.gif(2)

where U is the zonal (positive eastward) and V is the meridional (positive northward) components of the wind, and I and D are the inclination and declination of the magnetic field, correspondingly. Then one can try to solve the inverse problem: using the known variations in the plasma vertical drift W with longitude, l, to determine both components of the neutral wind with the accuracy up to the first Fourier harmonics. To do this, we expand the right-hand and left-hand parts of equation (2) into a finite Fourier series:

eq007.gif

eq008.gif(3)

[11]  It is known that the geomagnetic field parameters are well enough determined by two harmonics of the Fourier expansion:

eq009.gif

eq010.gif

eq011.gif

eq012.gif(4)

[12]  Then according to (2), the variations in the plasma vertical drift W should be described by three harmonics of the Fourier series. If one substitutes relations (3) and (4) into equation (2) and equalizes the corresponding terms, we obtain the equation system:

eq013.gif(5)

where v =(V0, Vc, Vs, U0, Uc, Us)T, w = (W0, W1c, W1s, W2c, W2s, W3c, W3s)T and A is the matrix of the 7 times 6 dimension, its elements depend only on the magnetic field parameters.

[13]  System (5) consists of 7 linear algebraic equations in 6 unknowns. In a classical sense it can have an infinite number of solutions, one solution (when one of the equations is a linear combination of 6 others) or no solutions at all. Note that vector w is determined experimentally and contains some errors. As a result, the classical solution of the system (even if it does exist) may describe the physical situation inadequately. However, we can try to find a normal solution [Tikhonov and Arsenin, 1986]. The vector with a minimal norm among those vectors for which the difference between the right-hand and left-hand parts of the system is minimal (such vectors are called pseudosolutions) is called a normal solution. It is known [Tikhonov and Arsenin, 1986] that the normal solution for system (5) exists and is unique. However, a determination of the normal solution is an incorrect problem: small changes (errors) in the input data (i.e., in the w vector) may cause rather large changes in the solution. To find a normal solution stable to small perturbations of the right-hand side of system (5), the Tikhonov regularization method [Tikhonov and Arsenin, 1986] was applied.

2005GI000112-fig02
Figure 2
[14]  The calculations performed have shown that the regularization method provides a stable solution for the meridional component of the wind V in the entire latitudinal belt considered, whereas for adequate determination of the zonal component U the accuracy in determination of the longitudinal variations in hmF2 is not sufficient. Therefore the neutral wind model HWM [Hedin et al., 1991] is used in subsequent calculations. Currently, it is the only global empirical model of the neutral wind so it is often used for calculations and comparisons with measurements. As a rule, a good agreement with both calculations and other measurements is noted. That raises some doubts, taking into account large inaccuracy of measurements of the wind velocity (by all methods) and insufficiently large data set used for the model elaboration (especially in the Southern Hemisphere) [Hedin et al., 1991]. Therefore the calculations were performed in order to determine how accurate the winds components obtained from the HWM model describe the longitudinal and latitudinal variations in hmF2. For this purpose the direct problem was solved: first longitudinal variations in the vertical drift W were calculated on the basis of the model values of the wind components, and then, using the servo model the longitudinal variations in hmF2 were calculated. The
2005GI000112-fig03
Figure 3
results of the calculations are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Comparing Figures 2a and 3a to Figures 1a and 1c, correspondingly, one can see that the longitudinal variations in hmF2 obtained on the basis of HWM model differ strongly in shape from the experimental ones (especially at high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere) as one could have expected. Thus the HWM model, on the whole, inadequately reproduces the longitudinal variations in the neutral wind. On the other hand, the considered average values of hmF2 are similar, and the local maximum in the meridional wind at longitudes about 180-240o in the Southern Hemisphere is again observed (see Figure 3c).

[15]  We tried to correct the HWM model using reliable measurements of hmF2 and applying the thermospheric and ionospheric models well recommended. We used the fact that the main contribution into the hmF2 variations is provided by the meridional component, whereas even strong changes in the zonal component of the wind weakly influence these variations [Karpachev and Gasilov, 2000]. The longitudinal variations in the zonal component of the wind calculated using the HWM model, were presented by one first harmonic, because taking into account the higher harmonics would exceed the measurement accuracy. Using the smoothed zonal wind and applying the regularization method, we determined the variations in the meridional component of the wind describing most accurate the experimental values of hmF2.

2005GI000112-fig04
Figure 4
2005GI000112-fig05
Figure 5
[16]  Figures 4 and 5 show the longitudinal variations in hmF2 according to the data of the Intercosmos 19 satellite (Figures 4a and 5a), calculated longitudinal variations in W (Figures 4b and 5b), calculated meridional component of the wind (Figures 4c and 5c), and smoothed zonal component of the wind for invariant latitudes 40o, 50o, 60o and 65o in the Northern and Southern hemispheres, respectively (Figures 4d and 5d). The obtained system of the winds reproduces the longitudinal variations in hmF2 in the entire region of the considered latitudes fairly well. For comparison, Figure 4b shows also the value of W obtained for the considered conditions at the Millstone Hill radar (54o L, 289oE) [Buonsanto and Witasse, 1999]. This value is approximately in the middle between the values calculated for 50o L and 60o L, that is a partial proof of the correctness of the calculations performed. Thus the global topside sounding data can be used for a correction of the neutral wind model.


AGU

Powered by TeXWeb (Win32, v.2.0).