Submitted to International Journal of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

A storm in the magnetospheric magnetic field

Yu. P. Maltsev and A. A. Ostapenko

Polar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia


Contents


Abstract

Several tens of hundreds of magnetic field measurements were used to study the statistical field behavior at distances of up to 30 Earth radii for different levels of the Dst index. It has been found that in the major part of the magnetospheric equatorial plane a magnetic field depression which increases during a storm takes place. The point where the depression is maximal is located at night at the distance of several RE. The field in the tail lobes grows as the storm enhances, the maximum increase occurring in the tail lobes nearest to the Earth. The external field picture in the noon-midnight meridian plane resembles the picture formed by the magnetotail currents.


Introduction

The magnetospheric magnetic field is

eqn001.gif(1)

where Bint is the field due to currents inside the Earth and Bext is the field produced by magnetospheric currents. The internal field Bint is rather stable; the external field Bext exhibits a strong variability. In particular, magnetic storms are accompanied by considerable variations in the magnetospheric magnetic field. The main characteristic of a magnetic storm is the hourly Dst index defined as the H component of the magnetic disturbance averaged over magnetograms of several low-latitude observatories located at different longitudes. The Dst index anticorrelates with the AE, AL, and Kp indexes which serve mainly to measure the substorm activity.

It is impossible to build a detailed distribution of the external magnetospric field during a particular storm because of an insufficient number of spacecraft, and, therefore, we are limited to statistical studies. In previous works the external field was studied in relation with the other than Dst indexes or with the Dst index, but in separate limited magnetospheric regions. For instance, Sugiura and Poros [1973] considered the field at 3-23  RE for quiet ( Kp = 0-1 ) and slightly disturbed ( Kp = 2-3 ) conditions. In the inner magnetosphere ( r < 5 RE at noon and r < 10 RE at midnight) the external field was found to be directed preferentially in the negative z direction (in the SM coordinate system). A similar result was obtained by Mead and Fairfield [1975] who approximated the external field at the distances from 4 RE to 17 RE by second-degree polynomials in the geocentric distance.

The dependence of the field on the Dst index was analyzed in the equatorial plane at 2.3-3.6  RE only. For these distances the empirical relation for the field averaged over longitude was obtained [Sugiura, 1973]

eqn002.gif(2)

The external field at 4-8.8  RE near the equatorial plane was plotted by Iijima et al. [1990] for long disturbed periods ( 2 leq Kp leq 6, -70 leq Dst leq -20 nT). A strong azimuthal field inhomogeneity which is likely to be due to the fact that the current in the nightside magnetosphere is by a factor of two or three stronger than in the dayside magnetosphere was discovered.

Ostapenko and Maltsev [1997] approximated the fields at 3-10  RE by the forth-degree polynomial in the geocentric distance. The polynomial coefficients were sought for as a linear combination of Dst and Kp indexes, dynamic solar wind pressure, and vertical IMF component. The dependence on Dst proved to be similar to that described by (2). With increasing distance from the Earth the dependence on Dst becomes weaker and at r = 10 RE it is negligibly weak. Earlier a similar result was obtained by Fairfield et al. [1987] for dependence of the external field on the Kp value.

So far the statistical dependence of the tail lobe field on the Dst index has not been studied. It was found that the tail lobe field grows with the AE index [Baumjohann et al., 1990]; the AL index [Nakai et al., 1991]; the southward IMF component [Fairfield and Jones, 1996; Nakai et al., 1991]; and dynamic solar wind pressure [Fairfield and Jones, 1996; Nakai et al., 1991; Ostapenko and Maltsev, 1998].

Up until now the field variations caused by a storm have not been studied for the entire magnetosphere. The goal of this work was to investigate the response of the magnetic field at distances -30 RE < x < 10 RE ; -15 RE < y < 15 RE ; and -15 RE < z < 15 RE to changes in the Dst index.


Treatment of the Data

The database described by Fairfield et al. [1994] was used. It includes more than 70,000 three-component magnetic field measurements carried out by 11 satellites in the region from 3 to 60  RE during 20 years. All the magnetic field measurements are supplemented by hourly Dst indexes and three-hour values of the Kp index. 67% of the data are complemented by hourly averages of the dynamic solar wind pressure p and three IMF components. For 47% of the data in the database, an hourly AE index is also given.

We used the data for the region -30 RE < x < 10 RE, y < 15 RE, and z < 15 RE. Depending on the Dst value, the initial data set was divided into three subsets. Table 1 shows the number of data points N in each subset and average values of Dst, Kp, AE, p, and IMF Bz. For each subset the external magnetic field was averaged over a three-dimensional mesh with the side length of 4  RE.

In averaging, the dawn-dusk and north-south symmetries were taken into account. For distances x > -10 RE, the SM coordinate system with the z axis antiparallel to the Earth dipole axis was used. For distances x < -10 RE, in the magnetotail, the GSM coordinate system with the x axis pointed toward the Sun was employed. To improve spatial resolution in the vicinity of the neutral sheet which experiences considerable variations due to changes in the Earth dipole tilt, we introduced the coordinate z = zGSM - zns, where zGSM is the solar-magnetospheric coordinate and zns is the coordinate of the neutral sheet determined from expression [Peredo et al., 1993].

eqn003.gif

zns = - D sin y if |y| >y0

where y is the Earth dipole tilt angle, H0 = 9 RE, D = 7 RE, and y0 = 13.5 RE.


Results

fig01 Figure 1 shows the magnetic field Bext due to external sources in the noon-midnight meridian plane for three magnetic activity levels: Dst > 0 ; 0 > Dst > -50 nT; and Dst < -50 nT. In the tail lobes the field is nearly horizontal. It is evident that this field is produced by the electric current in the plasma sheet flowing from east to west. The current grows with increasing storm activity. On the front side of the magnetosphere (at x > -10 RE) the field has a more complicated structure.

fig02 Figure 2 shows isolines Bzext = const in the equatorial plane (z = 0). It can be seen that magnetic depression spreads over the major part of the magnetosphere. As the storm intensity grows, the depression deepens and expands.

fig03 fig04 fig05 Figures 3, 4, and 5 present isolines Bxext = const and Byext = const in the x = -20 RE, x = -10 RE, and x = 0 planes, respectively. Bxext is seen to grow with increasing storm intensity. The Byext component depends on the Dst index in the x = -10 RE and x = 0 planes. The greatest increase in both components with storm enhancement is observed in the x = 0 plane.

fig06 To find the magnetospheric response to variations in the Dst index, we subtracted the left panel of Figure 1, which corresponds to quiet conditions (Dst > 0), from the right panel (Dst < -50 nT) plotted for the storm conditions. The result is shown in Figure 6.


Discussion

The external field Bext is typically presented as a sum of the fields of four magnetospheric currents

fig07

eqn004.gif(3)

The right-hand side of (3) includes the fields of the currents at the magnetopause, ring current, tail current, and field-aligned currents. The fields due to each of these currents in the noon-midnight meridian plane are shown schematically in Figure 7.

Comparison of Figures 1 and 7 reveals that the effect of the tail currents Bct dominates at all levels of magnetic activity. Only near the dayside magnetopause the field of the currents at the magnetopause Bmp dominates. The effect of the ring current Brc is rather weak. Most likely, it manifests itself in the increase in depression with approaching the Earth (Figure 2). The effect of field-aligned currents Bfa is even weaker.

It can be seen from Figures 3 and 4 that the magnetic field in the tail lobes grows with increasing depression during a storm. This points to intensification of tail currents.

Figure 5 demonstrates that the greatest growth in Bx during a storm takes place in the near-Earth tail lobes, at x = 0. This means that the near-Earth region of the tail current increases. Note that according to Figure 7 the ring current gives (  Brc)x =0 in the x = 0 plane. It can be expected that during a storm the region 1 fieldaligned currents inflowing into the ionosphere in the morning and outflowing in the evening will also become more intense. Above the Earth poles the x components of the fields due to the field-aligned and tail currents have the same sign (see Figure 7). At the magnetic shells located lower than the field-aligned current, the Bx component produced by the field-aligned current changes the sign, thereby weakening the field in the low-latitude regions of the near tail lobe. Thus the field-aligned current gives rise to irregularities in the magnetic field in the near-Earth tail lobe. This irregularity is seen at the top of Figure 5, but it is not very pronounced. This suggests that the tail currents give rise to a stronger magnetic effect in the x= 0 plane than field-aligned currents.

The By component of the external field is nearly independent of Dst at distances x = -20 RE (Figure 3). A slight dependence on Dst appears at x = -10 RE (Figure 4). In the x = 0 plane passing through the Earth center the By component exhibits a very strong dependence on storm intensity (Figure 5).

Magnetic depression is observed in the major part of the equatorial plane of the magnetosphere at all activity levels (Figure 2). As the storm activity grows, depression increases and expands to more distant regions. The epicenter of depression is shifted relative to the Earth center by approximately 3  RE toward the night side. Note that measurements for distances less that 3  RE are not available, and so isolines in this region in Figure 2 are the result of interpolation. Sugiura [1973] studied the field in the equatorial plane at 2.3-3.6  RE. For the field averaged over longitude the empirical relation (2) was obtained. Iijima et al. [1990] plotted the field distribution near the equatorial plane at 4-8.8  RE for -70 leq Dst leq -20 nT with the average value of Dst of -34 nT. The field distribution in Figure 2 is similar to that obtained by these authors, but it is more smooth. This is caused probably by the fact that we used larger meshes for field averaging. Otherwise we would not have had enough data to plot the field dependence on the Dst index for the entire magnetosphere volume.

The differential field shown in Figure 6 resembles most of all the field Bct in Figure 7. This implies that mainly the tail current increases as the storm becomes more intense.


Conclusions

Variations in the external magnetic field at distances up to 30  RE have been studied as a function of storm intensity. It has been shown that for all storm activity levels the effect of magnetotail currents dominates. As the storm enhances, the tail current effect becomes stronger. The field due to magnetopause currents prevails in the distant region of the dayside magnetosphere.


Acknowledgment

The work was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 99-05-64557).


References

Baumjohann, W., G. Paschmann, and H. Luhr, Pressure balance between lobe and plasma sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17, 45, 1990.

Fairfield, D. H., and J. Jones, Variability of the tail lobe field strength, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7785, 1996.

Fairfield, D. H., M. H. Acuna, L. J. Zanetti, and T. A. Potemra, The magnetic field of the equatorial magnetotail: AMPTE/CCE observations at R < 8.8 RE, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 7432, 1987.

Fairfield, D. H., N. A. Tsyganenko, A. V. Usmanov, and M. V. Malkov, A large magnetosphere magnetic field database, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 11,319, 1994.

Iijima, T., T. A. Potemra, and L. J. Zanetti, Large-scale characteristics of magnetospheric equatorial currents, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 991, 1990.

Mead, G. D., and D. H. Fairfield, A quantitative magnetospheric model derived from spacecraft magnetometer data, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 523, 1975.

Nakai, H., Y. Kamide, and C. T. Russell, Influences of solar wind parameters and geomagnetic activity on the tail lobe magnetic field: A statistical study, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5511, 1991.

Ostapenko, A. A., and Y. P. Maltsev, Relation of the magnetic field in the magnetosphere to the geomagnetic and solar wind activity, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 17,467, 1997.

Ostapenko, A. A., and Yu. P. Maltsev, Three-dimensional magnetospheric response to variations in the solar wind dynamic pressure, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 261, 1998.

Peredo, M., D. P. Stern, and N. A. Tsyganenko, Are existing magnetospheric models excessively stretched?, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 15,343, 1993.

Sugiura, M., Quiet time magnetospheric field depression at 2.3-3.6  RE, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 3182, 1973.

Sugiura, M., and D. J. Poros, A magnetospheric field incorporating the Ogo 3 and 5 magnetic field observations, Planet. Space Sci., 21, 1763, 1973.


 Load files for printing and local use.

This document was generated by TeXWeb (Win32, v.2.0) on September 8, 1999.