RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, VOL. 14, ES2005, doi:10.2205/2014ES000542, 2014


Table 1. Structural data variation based on complex analysis results
Geophysical data Factor weight in a feature, % MSK, % MSK taking into in
account the weight, %
1. Gravity field (G) 100 50.02
1.1. $G\_F1$ 2.80 33.39 0.93
1.2. $G\_F2$ 27.11 49.55 13.43
1.3. $G\_F3$ 70.09 51.14 35.84
2. Magnetic field (T) 100 35.27
2.1. $Ta\_F1$ 12.20 19.42 2.37
2.2. $Ta\_F2$ 56.73 40.00 22.70
2.3. $Ta\_F3$ 31.07 32.83 10.20
3. Relief (H) 100 41.13
3.1. $H\_F1$ 1.27 16.61 0.21
3.2. $H\_F2$ 16.63 29.64 4.93
3.3. $H\_F3$ 82.10 43.84 35.99
4. GPS data 100 70.85
4.1 GPS hor. 50 75.01 37.50
4.2. GPS vert. 50 66.70 33.35
5. Heat flow density 100 65.28 65.28
Averaged on 5 features of different nature 52.51

      Powered by MathJax


Citation: Assinovskaya B. A., M. K. Ovsov (2014), Seismotectonic zoning of the Finnish–Bothnia region based on the structural analysis method, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 14, ES2005, doi:10.2205/2014ES000542.


Generated from LaTeX source by SemTeXML, v.1.2 software package.