RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES VOL. 7, ES3003, doi:10.2205/2005ES000175, 2005

2005ES000175-fig05.html
Figure 5. The example of the relative paleointensity variation obtained after studying the magnetization of the rocks from 12 ocean-floor core samples for the time interval of 50 thousand years. The DIP2 paleointensity decline corresponds to the Matuyama/Brunes boundary, the DIP1 reflecting the triggering mechanism of the reversal, as follows from our interpretation of Figure 6 from [Hartl and Tauxe, 1996].

RJES

Citation: Gurarii, G. Z. (2005), Geomagnetic field reversals: Main results and basic problems, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 7, ES3003, doi:10.2205/2005ES000175.

Copyright 2005 by the Russian Journal of Earth Sciences
Powered by TeXWeb (Win32, v.2.0).